When I was in High School, one of my classmate's dad owned a Ford dealership. When my classmate graduated from college, he went to work for dad. A few years ago his dad passed away, now he and his brothers and sisters run the business. There is a furniture store here, the founder died several years ago, yet his kids now run it. This is a great way to pass economic security, and sure it isn't for everyone, nor is it the only way. It is one way generations of Americans have done it, and it works.
Today, we are not seeing family businesses popping up as regularly, or with as much vigor, why? The big guys have always been a factor. I am sure Frank Woolworth did not want to see Sam Walton succeed. Just like General Motors doesn't want a Delorean, or Tesla to succeed. It is these businesses that change the world. Thomas Edison's company is still around, but how much inventing is going on there? What have they done to change the world? Surely not as much as Edison did. Big corporations get conservative. They protect themselves. They no longer see the business as the founder, and that is why small business is important. And our system keeps it clean, if a founder of a business has a flawed goal, it will go out of business. The reverse is true as well. There are more than a few reasons small business is hindered in today's world.
First, and most important, in my view, is government. As government has grown, more laws and regulation has stifled small business. Government makes it more expensive to launch a business. And government would rather have to work with a few very large concerns than thousands of small ones. Why do NFL owners get their stores (stadiums) built with taxpayer money, yet John Smith gets no help building his widget store? Why does Walmart get TIF financing, yet other businesses do not? Why do states court large companies like AT&T or Boeing, and not Barb's Beauty Shop or Dale's Bakery?
Large companies have certain advantages of scale, making it hard for small companies to compete. In our industry, a couple of concerns spend millions of dollars every year advertising. A single store cannot. The result is people are drawn by the advertising to their stores and they are successful. Money flows out to the corporate headquarters. Advertising sales people have less business to call on. This meshes with a previous article on "Too Big to Fail". Why is that true? Resources should go to the best utilization, and that is not always the biggest company. The biggest company, however, is easier to deal with, and more likely on first name basis with leaders. Unions have an easier road to organization. And people see jobs. A win for the politician.
The single person, with a revolutionary idea, is what drove us throughout the last century. The Editions, Fords, Rockefellers, Woolworths, Sears, Kresskes, all made this country a better place. Can you imagine a couple of brothers designing and manufacturing a new airplane in their garage? The Wright Brothers did. Do you see a new machine on the horizon, built in a basement that will help run the world? Jobs and Wozniak did that. We are losing that. And that will be a loss to our nation as a whole. We need to celebrate entrepreneurship. We need a new generation of free thinkers, that don't say "yes sir", but rather "how can I do that." We don't need to even the playing field, we need to get off the field and let them work.
That's not to say some interference isn't a good thing. Some of the above companies had horrible reputations with their employees, and we as a community need to make sure there are ways to address that. Today we don't really have that, sure there are minimum wage laws, and unions. All sorts of Human Resource laws in fact. But they do little good, in that they are enforced unevenly, and are generally used as tactics.
![]() |
Advertisement |
Unions as an example love minimum wage laws, because their contract is generally tied to them. If minimum wage goes up, so do their members wages. So often you will see Unions lobbying for increases, not for the young couple trying to make ends meet, not to encourage fuller employment, but to get their people a raise, without working as hard for it at the negotiation table. The result has seen a decline over the last 4 or 5 decades in teen employment.
Big companies can build factories anywhere. Apple uses factories in China. Most shoe companies manufacture off shore. Even plumbing fixtures are coming in from overseas. And that means we have less middle class factory jobs here. Walk down the aisles of stores and look at how much is imported. Brands that used to be made here. Bigger is not always better. As those jobs leave, minimum wage jobs are all that is left. Fast food, and others are the only place more and more people can go, these businesses cannot offer a great middle class income, and skills are not as needed. Skilled workers make more than unskilled. How much skill is there in flipping a burger? Or selling trinkets in a mall? I remember people saying robots were going to take the "good" jobs, and while we use a lot of robots, I contend Big business takes more, by moving them away. Should we not encourage those small businesses that work within their communities?
Instead we have empty stores. Crushed dreams. And we are the poorer for it.
Spend Wisely!